Mix Proportioning Basics | MixDesignCalc 2026 β€” Ingredient Roles, w/c Law, Aggregate Optimization & Worked Example

Mix Proportioning Basics

MixDesignCalc 2026 β€” Understanding How Concrete Mix Proportions Are Determined: Ingredient Roles, Abrams' w/c Law, Aggregate Optimisation, IS 10262:2019 Table 2 Water Contents, Paste vs Aggregate Balance & Complete M30 Worked Example

IS 10262:2019 Table 2Abrams' Law Aggregate GradingFA/CA Balance Paste VolumeM30 Worked Example

1. The Four Ingredients and Their Roles

IS 456:2000 IS 8112 / IS 12269 (Cement) IS 383:2016 (Aggregate)

Concrete is a composite material made from four primary ingredients. Understanding what each ingredient does β€” and what controls its quantity β€” is the foundation of mix proportioning. Every proportioning decision is a balance between these four roles.

🏭
Cement
10–18%
By volume of concrete. The binder β€” reacts with water to form C-S-H gel (calcium silicate hydrate) that glues aggregate particles together. The most expensive ingredient (~60–70% of concrete cost). Its quantity is derived from water content and w/c ratio: C = W / (w/c). Should be minimised within IS 456 limits.
πŸ’§
Water
15–21%
By volume of concrete. Serves two roles: (1) chemically reacts with cement for hydration; (2) provides workability (fluidity for placement). Water is the single most critical variable β€” it controls both workability and w/c ratio. Excess water beyond hydration need increases porosity and reduces strength. Goal: minimise water to minimise cement.
🟑
Fine Aggregate (Sand)
25–35%
By volume of concrete. Particles <4.75mm (IS 383). Fills voids between coarse aggregate particles, improves workability, and contributes to surface finish. Too little FA β†’ harsh mix, difficult to pump; too much FA β†’ high water demand (more surface area to wet). Zone II sand is the IS 10262 reference.
πŸͺ¨
Coarse Aggregate (Stone)
40–55%
By volume of concrete. Particles >4.75mm (IS 383). Provides strength through aggregate interlock and load transfer, reduces paste volume (economy), and governs MSA selection. Larger CA requires less surface area wetting β†’ lower water demand β†’ lower cement. IS 456 Cl.5.3.1 limits MSA by element geometry and bar spacing.
The fundamental rule: Only two ingredients directly affect concrete strength β€” cement and water (through the w/c ratio). Aggregates are essentially inert filler at normal concrete grades (M10–M40). The job of mix proportioning is to select the minimum water that gives adequate workability, then calculate the cement needed to achieve the design w/c, then fill the remaining volume with optimally graded aggregate.

2. Abrams' Water-Cement Ratio Law

In 1918, Duff Abrams published his experimental finding that, for fully-compacted concrete made with the same materials, the compressive strength is determined primarily by the water-cement ratio alone, regardless of the absolute quantities of water and cement.

Abrams' Law: f'c = K₁ / Kβ‚‚^(w/c)

Where:
f'c = compressive strength
K₁ = empirical constant (~97 MPa for OPC, varying by cement type)
Kβ‚‚ = empirical constant (~4.0 for OPC at 28 days)
w/c = water-cement ratio by mass

Simplified practical form (IS 10262 correlation for OPC 53):
fcm β‰ˆ 58 Γ— (0.51)^(w/c / 0.10) [approximate β€” verify by trial]

Or inversely: w/c β‰ˆ (1.78 βˆ’ fcm Γ— 0.0145) [IS 10262 regression approximation]

The w/c Scale β€” Strength and Durability Together

The water-cement ratio is the single most important parameter because it governs both strength and durability simultaneously:

  • Strength (Abrams' Law): Lower w/c β†’ higher strength. Approximately every 0.05 reduction in w/c increases 28-day cube strength by 5–8 MPa for OPC 53.
  • Durability (permeability): Lower w/c β†’ denser paste β†’ lower permeability β†’ better resistance to chloride, carbonation, sulfate attack. This is why IS 456 Table 5 limits maximum w/c by exposure class, independently of strength.
0.25UHPC
v.high str.
0.30M60+
HSC
0.35–0.40M40–M50
Extreme
0.45M30
Severe
0.50M25
Moderate
0.55–0.60M20
Mild
>0.65Lean
blinding

IS 456:2000 Table 5 β€” The Durability Override

Abrams' Law gives the strength-based w/c. But IS 456 Table 5 may impose a lower (more restrictive) maximum w/c based on the exposure class. Design always uses the lower of the two:

Mild exposure: max w/c 0.60 β€” strength usually governs below M30
Moderate: max w/c 0.50 β€” durability governs from M20 upward
Severe: max w/c 0.45 β€” durability governs for M25–M30
Very Severe: max w/c 0.40 β€” durability always governs
Extreme: max w/c 0.35 β€” durability dominates completely

Why Abrams' Law Works β€” The Micro-Scale Explanation

Cement hydration only needs about w/c = 0.23 to fully react (Powers, 1947). All water above this threshold forms capillary pores when it evaporates β€” and these pores weaken the paste. At w/c = 0.70, capillary porosity is ~40% of paste volume. At w/c = 0.35, it is ~15%. The direct relationship between capillary porosity and both strength and permeability explains why Abrams' Law and IS 456 durability requirements both point to the same conclusion: lower is better, up to the minimum needed for workability.

3. Water Content β€” The Master Variable of Mix Proportioning

Water content (W, in L/mΒ³) is the starting variable in the IS 10262:2019 calculation sequence β€” everything else follows from it. Once W is fixed and the design w/c is determined, cement content is simply C = W / w/c. Then aggregate fills the remaining volume. Reducing water content is the single most effective lever for simultaneously reducing cement content, improving strength, and improving durability.

What Controls Water Content?

The free water content required to achieve a given workability (slump) depends on three factors:

1. Maximum Aggregate Size (MSA)

Larger aggregate particles have less total surface area per unit volume than smaller particles. Less surface area = less water needed to wet the aggregate = lower water demand. Going from 10mm to 40mm MSA reduces water demand by approximately 30–35 L/mΒ³ β€” saving roughly 65–75 kg/mΒ³ of cement at the same w/c. This is the most powerful aggregate-side lever for cement economy.

2. Aggregate Shape and Texture

Crushed aggregate (angular, rough surface) has higher water demand than rounded natural gravel (smooth surface). IS 10262 Table 2 is calibrated for crushed aggregate β€” if using rounded gravel, reduce tabulated water by ~20 L/mΒ³ (IS 10262 Note). Flaky or elongated aggregates dramatically increase water demand and should be minimised (IS 383: flakiness index ≀ 25%; elongation index ≀ 15%).

3. Target Slump (Workability)

Higher slump requires more water (or more SP). In IS 10262 Table 2, each 25mm increase in slump requires approximately 5–8 L/mΒ³ more water. This water increase is proportional and also increases required cement (since w/c must be maintained). Using PCE SP to achieve slump without adding water is the engineered solution β€” SP provides workability without the water penalty.

Water Content Relationships:

Effect of MSA (crushed aggregate, 100mm slump):
10mm β†’ ~222 L/mΒ³ | 20mm β†’ ~202 L/mΒ³ | 40mm β†’ ~176 L/mΒ³
(Range: 10mm vs 40mm = 46 L/mΒ³ difference β†’ ~100 kg/mΒ³ cement saving at w/c 0.45)

Effect of rounded aggregate: subtract ~20 L/mΒ³ from crushed values
Effect of SP (PCE, 25% WR): multiply by (1 βˆ’ 0.25) = 0.75
Effect of slump increase (25mm→100mm at 20mm MSA): +5 to +8 L/m³ per 25mm

Cement Content: C = W / (w/c)
Cost Impact: Each 10 L/mΒ³ reduction in W β†’ 22 kg/mΒ³ less cement at w/c 0.45

4. IS 10262:2019 Table 2 β€” Free Water Content Reference

IS 10262:2019 Table 2 provides the reference water content in L/mΒ³ for crushed angular aggregate at various MSA and slump combinations. This table is the starting point for the water content step β€” before any adjustment for aggregate type, admixture, or moisture condition. The values below are the IS 10262:2019 tabulated figures.

← Scroll
MSA (mm) Target Slump (mm)
25–5051–7576–100101–125126–150151–175
10mm208215222228234240
12.5mm200207213219225231
16mm196200206212218223
20mm190196202208213217
25mm184188193199204208
40mm168172176181185189

Highlighted cell (green): 20mm MSA, 76–100mm slump = 202 L/mΒ³ β€” the most common reference for M25–M35 structural concrete.

How to Apply the Table β€” Step by Step

  1. Select row: Based on the MSA you have chosen (limited by IS 456 Cl.5.3.1)
  2. Select column: Based on the target slump at placement (not at the plant β€” allow for transit loss of ~20–30mm for 30-minute transit)
  3. Read off water content from the table
  4. Adjust for aggregate type: If rounded gravel β€” subtract 20 L/mΒ³. If recycled aggregate β€” add 15 L/mΒ³
  5. Adjust for SP: Multiply by (1 βˆ’ WR%), where WR% is the SP water reduction percentage. PCE SP at 1% dose typically gives 22–25% WR, so multiply by 0.75–0.78
  6. Result: This is the design free water content W to use in C = W / w/c

Common Confusion β€” Table 2 is for SSD Aggregates

IS 10262 Table 2 water contents assume aggregates in Saturated Surface-Dry (SSD) condition β€” pores full but surface dry. In practice, aggregates have surface moisture (wet) or are air-dry (below SSD). The batch water must be corrected:

If aggregate is wetter than SSD: reduce batch water by (surface moisture % Γ— aggregate mass)
If aggregate is drier than SSD: increase batch water by (absorption deficit Γ— aggregate mass)

IS 10262:2019 Clause 5.6 gives the correction formula. In monsoon season with wet river sand at 3% surface moisture, the water correction can be 50–60 L/mΒ³ β€” entirely changing the mix if ignored.

5. Paste vs Aggregate Volume β€” The Fundamental Trade-off

In every cubic metre of concrete, the volumes of paste (cement + water + air + admixtures) and aggregate (FA + CA) must sum to exactly 1.0 mΒ³. More paste means less aggregate, and vice versa. This trade-off is the core tension in mix proportioning.

Typical Volumetric Composition β€” M25 vs M60 (per mΒ³)
M25 (w/c 0.50, 20mm, no SP)
Cement 12%
Water 17.5%
Air 2%
FA 27%
CA 41.5%
Paste = 31.5% | Aggregate = 68.5%
M60 HSC (w/c 0.28, SF 10%, PCE, 16mm)
OPC 15%
SF 5%
Water 13.5%
Air
FA 24%
CA 36%
SP
Paste = 35.5% | Aggregate = 60%

Consequences of Too Much Paste (High Cement)

  • Increased heat of hydration β†’ thermal cracking in large sections
  • Higher drying shrinkage β†’ more cracks
  • Reduced aggregate volume β†’ lost aggregate interlock in HSC
  • Higher cost β†’ 60–70% of concrete cost is cement
  • IS 456 Cl.8.2.5 cap at 550 kg/mΒ³ total cementitious

Consequences of Too Little Paste (Low Cement)

  • Insufficient paste to coat and lubricate all aggregate surfaces β†’ harsh, unworkable mix
  • Poor pump performance β†’ blockages
  • Honeycombing β†’ voids β†’ strength and durability deficiency
  • Violation of IS 456 Table 5 minimum cement content

The Optimal Paste Volume Window

Research and practical experience show that for most structural concrete:

Paste volume 26–32% of total concrete volume is the practical sweet spot for most M20–M35 concrete with 20mm crushed aggregate. Below 26%: workability problems. Above 35%: excessive shrinkage and heat risk.

For HSC (M45–M60) with SF and PCE, paste volumes of 33–38% are typical β€” the dense SF-rich paste is less porous than standard paste, so higher paste volumes don't carry the same shrinkage penalty.

The absolute volume calculation automatically determines paste volume: V_paste = V_cement + V_water + V_air + V_SP. Always check this value as a sanity check on your mix design.

6. Aggregate Optimisation β€” MSA and Grading

6.1 Selecting Maximum Aggregate Size (MSA)

MSA selection is governed by IS 456:2000 Clause 5.3.1, which sets three upper limits β€” the MSA must satisfy all three simultaneously:

MSA ≀ 1/4 Γ— minimum cross-sectional dimension of the structural member
MSA ≀ 3/4 Γ— clear spacing between bars (or between bar and formwork)
MSA ≀ (nominal cover βˆ’ 5 mm)

Design MSA = min(all three constraints above)

Then choose the largest standard size ≀ design MSA:
Standard sizes: 10mm, 12.5mm, 16mm, 20mm, 25mm, 31.5mm, 40mm (IS 383:2016)

Practical MSA Selection Guide

  • Columns with dense reinforcement: 12.5–16mm (seismic columns: sometimes 10mm)
  • Beams, standard reinforcement: 20mm
  • Slabs, wide spacing: 20–25mm
  • Foundations, plain sections: 40mm (best economy)
  • Mass concrete, retaining walls: 40–63–80mm
  • Pumped concrete: MSA ≀ 1/3 of pump pipe diameter (100mm pipe β†’ 32mm max β†’ use 25–31.5mm)
  • Pavement concrete (IRC:58): 31.5mm specified

Economy Impact of MSA Selection

The cement saving from increasing MSA is significant:

At M30, 100mm slump, w/c 0.45:
10mm MSA: W = 222 L/mΒ³ β†’ C = 222/0.45 = 493 kg/mΒ³
20mm MSA: W = 202 L/mΒ³ β†’ C = 202/0.45 = 449 kg/mΒ³
40mm MSA: W = 176 L/mΒ³ β†’ C = 176/0.45 = 391 kg/mΒ³

10mm β†’ 40mm: saves 102 kg/mΒ³ cement = β‚Ή612/mΒ³ at β‚Ή6/kg
Select the largest MSA permitted by IS 456 Cl.5.3.1 for your section.

6.2 Aggregate Grading β€” Why It Matters

Aggregate grading (particle size distribution) affects the workability and paste requirement of concrete. Well-graded aggregate with a range of particle sizes packs more efficiently β€” smaller particles fill voids between larger ones, reducing the void space that paste must fill. Poorly graded aggregate (gap-graded or single-sized) has higher void content and needs more paste to achieve the same workability.

IS 383:2016 Fine Aggregate Zones β€” Practical Significance

IS 383:2016 classifies fine aggregate into four grading zones based on the percentage passing 600Β΅m sieve:

Zone I (Coarse sand): 60–79% passing 600Β΅m. Lower water demand. Needs lower FA% in mix. Good for concrete but may need more paste for cohesion. FM β‰ˆ 3.0–3.5.
Zone II (Standard): 75–100% passing 600Β΅m. IS 10262 Table 3 reference. Most common M-Sand specification. FM β‰ˆ 2.6–2.9.
Zone III (Medium-fine): 85–100% passing 600Β΅m. Higher water demand. Increase FA% slightly. FM β‰ˆ 2.2–2.6.
Zone IV (Fine): 95–100% passing 600Β΅m. Highest water demand. Not recommended for M30+ designed mix. FM β‰ˆ 1.6–2.2. Avoid for structural concrete where possible.

River sand in India is commonly Zone II–III. M-Sand (crushed aggregate fines) is often Zone I–II. Zone IV (very fine) river sand from certain rivers increases water demand by 15–20 L/mΒ³ compared to Zone II.

7. FA/CA Proportion Split β€” IS 10262:2019 Table 3

After the total aggregate volume (V_agg) is determined by the absolute volume method, it must be split between fine aggregate (FA) and coarse aggregate (CA). IS 10262:2019 Table 3 provides the percentage of FA by volume of total aggregate, as a function of MSA and FA zone.

← Scroll
MSA (mm) Zone I FA%Zone II FA%Zone III FA%Zone IV FA%
10mm40444852
12.5mm36404448
16mm34384246
20mm32364044
25mm30343842
40mm28323640

Highlighted cell: 20mm MSA, Zone II β€” 36% FA. Most common starting point for M25–M40 structural concrete.

Adjusting the FA/CA Split in Practice

The IS 10262 Table 3 value is a starting point for trial mixes. It assumes Zone II sand and standard crushed granite. Adjustments are made based on:

Workability Too Low

If the mix is harsh or has poor workability despite correct slump, increase FA% by 2–4% (more fine particles improve cohesion and flowability). Re-check: increasing FA reduces CA proportionally, so recalculate masses. More FA also means slightly higher water demand β€” check slump.

Segregation or Bleed

If concrete shows bleeding (water rising to surface) or segregation (coarse aggregate separating), reduce FA%. More CA and less FA typically reduces bleed. Also check that water content isn't excessive β€” bleeding is primarily a symptom of excess water, not an FA/CA imbalance.

Pump Mixes

Pumpable concrete needs more paste and more fine material to lubricate the pipe walls. Increase FA% by 3–5% above Table 3 value. Also ensure paste volume is sufficient β€” lean pumped mixes (low cement) frequently block. Minimum paste volume ~30% for reliable pumping.

8. Durability-Governed Proportioning

For grades M25 and above in most exposure conditions, IS 456 Table 5 exposure class requirements impose tighter constraints on mix proportions than strength requirements alone. Understanding when durability governs β€” rather than strength β€” is essential to correct proportioning.

When Durability Governs

Durability governs the proportioning when the IS 456 Table 5 maximum w/c is lower than the w/c required for the target mean strength. For example:

  • M30 in Moderate exposure (max w/c 0.50): strength needs w/c β‰ˆ 0.48; IS 456 allows 0.50. Strength governs slightly.
  • M30 in Severe exposure (max w/c 0.45): strength needs w/c β‰ˆ 0.48; IS 456 limits to 0.45. Durability governs β€” must use lower w/c.
  • M30 in Very Severe exposure (max w/c 0.40): IS 456 limits w/c to 0.40 β€” 25 MPa stronger than strength requires. Durability overwhelmingly governs.

When durability governs, the resulting concrete will be stronger than specified (because using a lower w/c than strength needs produces higher strength). This strength reserve is not a problem β€” it is simply a consequence of the durability-first design approach mandated by IS 456.

The Two-Limit Framework β€” Always Take the Lower w/c

IS 10262:2019 Cl.5.3 is explicit: design w/c is the lower of the w/c from the strength-w/c relationship AND the IS 456 Table 5 maximum for the exposure class. Never use a w/c higher than both limits, even if the client objects to higher cement costs β€” the code mandates it for legally compliant structural concrete.

The minimum cement content (IS 456 Table 5) is a separate additional constraint β€” the design cement = max(C_calc, C_min). Both the maximum w/c and minimum cement must be satisfied simultaneously.

9. How Admixtures Change the Proportions

Chemical admixtures modify concrete properties by chemical or physical action at low dose rates. They do not change the fundamental proportioning approach β€” but they change the numbers significantly. IS 9103:1999 governs admixtures in India.

PCE Superplasticizer (Type F/G) β€” The Most Important

Polycarboxylate Ether (PCE) superplasticizers disperse cement particles through steric repulsion, allowing the same workability to be achieved at 20–35% less water. This water reduction allows proportional cement reduction (same w/c, less C = less W). The proportioning adjustment for PCE SP:

W_design = W_table Γ— (1 βˆ’ WR_fraction)
C_design = W_design / w/c

Example: M30, 20mm, 100mm slump, PCE 25% WR:
W_table = 202 L/mΒ³
W_design = 202 Γ— 0.75 = 151.5 β†’ say 152 L/mΒ³
C_design = 152 / 0.45 = 338 kg/mΒ³
vs without PCE: C = 202/0.45 = 449 kg/mΒ³
Saving: 111 kg/mΒ³ cement = ~β‚Ή666/mΒ³

Additionally, the SP liquid volume (typically 3–5 L/mΒ³) must be included in the absolute volume calculation: V_SP = SP_mass / (Sg_SP Γ— 1000).

Other Admixtures β€” Proportioning Adjustments

Retarder

Does not change proportions. Extends setting time without affecting water demand. No adjustment to water or cement content needed. Include volume in absolute volume check (typically 0.5–1.0 L/mΒ³).

Air-Entraining Admixture (AEA)

Introduces 4–6% air by volume β€” significant volume that displaces both paste and aggregate. Two adjustments: (1) Reduce water by 5–8 L/mΒ³ (air bubbles improve workability slightly); (2) V_agg is reduced by the air fraction, so FA and CA masses are lower. Check that target strength is still met β€” each 1% air reduces strength by approximately 4–5%.

SCM Additions (Fly Ash, GGBS, SF)

Each SCM has a different specific gravity from OPC β€” their volume must be calculated separately. GGBS (Sg 2.90) and Fly Ash (Sg 2.20) have lower Sg than OPC (Sg 3.15), so the same mass occupies more volume. Silica Fume (Sg 2.20) is additive to OPC rather than replacing it by volume β€” it occupies additional volume, reducing aggregate content.

10. Full Worked Example β€” M30, 100mm Slump, 20mm MSA

A complete IS 10262:2019 absolute volume mix design for the most common structural concrete specification: M30, Severe exposure, 100mm target slump, 20mm crushed granite, OPC 53, PCE SP at 1.0% bwoc with 22% water reduction, Zone II M-Sand.

Given Data

fck = 30 MPa | Exposure = Severe | Target slump = 100mm | MSA = 20mm
Cement: OPC 53, Sg = 3.15 | FA (M-Sand Zone II): Sg = 2.65
CA (Crushed Granite): Sg = 2.68 | PCE SP: Dose = 1.0% bwoc, Sg = 1.06, Solid = 40%
Entrapped air = 2.0%

1
Target Mean Strength

IS 10262 Table 1: for M30, S = 5.0 MPa

fcm = fck + 1.65 Γ— S = 30 + 1.65 Γ— 5.0 = 30 + 8.25 = 38.25 MPa

2
Design w/c Ratio

From strength-w/c relationship for OPC 53: w/c for fcm 38.25 MPa β‰ˆ 0.47. IS 456 Table 5 maximum for Severe exposure: w/c ≀ 0.45. Use the lower value.

Strength-based: w/c β‰ˆ 0.47
IS 456 Severe: w/c ≀ 0.45
Design w/c = min(0.47, 0.45) = 0.45

3
Design Free Water Content

IS 10262 Table 2: 20mm MSA, 76–100mm slump β†’ 202 L/mΒ³. PCE SP at 22% WR:

W_table = 202 L/mΒ³ (crushed aggregate, 100mm slump, 20mm MSA)
PCE water reduction = 22%
W_design = 202 Γ— (1 βˆ’ 0.22) = 202 Γ— 0.78 = 157.6 β†’ say 158 L/mΒ³

4
Cement Content

IS 456 Table 5 minimum for Severe exposure: 320 kg/mΒ³.

C_calc = W / w/c = 158 / 0.45 = 351.1 kg/mΒ³
IS 456 minimum (Severe) = 320 kg/mΒ³
C_design = max(351.1, 320) = 351 kg/mΒ³ [Strength governs]
Check max: 351 ≀ 550 kg/mΒ³ βœ…

5
Superplasticizer Volume & Water Correction

SP mass = C Γ— dose = 351 Γ— 0.010 = 3.51 kg/mΒ³
SP volume = 3.51 / 1.06 = 3.31 L/mΒ³ = 0.00331 mΒ³/mΒ³
SP free water = 3.31 Γ— (1 βˆ’ 0.40) = 1.99 L/mΒ³
Batch water = 158.0 βˆ’ 1.99 = 156.0 L/mΒ³

6
Absolute Volumes

V_cement = 351 / (3.15 Γ— 1000) = 0.1114 mΒ³
V_water = 158 / 1000 = 0.1580 mΒ³
V_air = 2.0% = 0.0200 mΒ³
V_SP = 3.31 / 1000 = 0.0033 mΒ³
────────────────────────────────────────────
Sum (paste) = 0.2927 mΒ³ β†’ Paste volume = 29.3% βœ…
V_aggregate = 1.0000 βˆ’ 0.2927 = 0.7073 mΒ³

7
FA/CA Split (IS 10262 Table 3)

20mm MSA, Zone II FA β†’ FA% = 36% of total aggregate volume

V_FA = 0.7073 Γ— 0.36 = 0.2546 mΒ³ β†’ FA = 0.2546 Γ— 2.65 Γ— 1000 = 675 kg/mΒ³
V_CA = 0.7073 Γ— 0.64 = 0.4527 mΒ³ β†’ CA = 0.4527 Γ— 2.68 Γ— 1000 = 1213 kg/mΒ³

8
Final Mix Design β€” Summary & Verification

OPC 53 Cement: 351 kg/mΒ³
Batch Water: 156 L/mΒ³
Fine Aggregate (SSD): 675 kg/mΒ³
Coarse Aggregate(SSD):1213 kg/mΒ³
PCE SP (liquid): 3.31 L/mΒ³
─────────────────────────────────
Fresh density = 351 + 156 + 675 + 1213 + 3.51 = 2398.5 kg/mΒ³

Verification (volume sum):
0.1114 + 0.1580 + 0.0200 + 0.0033 + 0.2546 + 0.4527 = 1.0000 mΒ³ βœ…

Mix ratio (1:FA:CA) = 1 : 1.92 : 3.46
Effective w/c = 156/351 = 0.444 (≀ 0.45 IS 456 βœ…)
IS 456 min cement = 320 kg/mΒ³; design = 351 βœ…

βœ… This Mix Design Is Now Ready for Trial Mix Verification

The calculated proportions above are the starting point for IS 10262:2019 Clause 7 trial mixes. Prepare at least three batches using the above proportions with your actual site materials, measure fresh slump and density, cast 6 cubes (150mm) per batch, cure at 27Β±2Β°C in water, and test at 7 days (expect ~28 MPa) and 28 days (expect ~38–40 MPa). If results are within acceptable range, this mix design is confirmed for production. If not, adjust w/c or water as described in the trial mix procedure section.