Complete Sand Guide 2026 — IS 383:2016 Grading Zones, Sieve Analysis, Fineness Modulus, Specific Gravity, Bulking, Silt Content, M-Sand Specification & IS 2386 Test Methods for Concrete Mix Design
Explore Sand Reference TablesFine aggregate (FA) is defined in IS 383:2016 as all material passing the 4.75mm IS sieve. In Indian concrete practice, fine aggregate means natural river sand, manufactured sand (M-sand) from crushed rock, or a blend of both. Fine aggregate typically constitutes 30–40% of the total concrete volume and has a disproportionately large influence on concrete workability, water demand, surface finish, and — through its effect on the paste-to-aggregate ratio — compressive strength and durability.
The Indian concrete industry's relationship with fine aggregate underwent a fundamental shift between 2016 and 2026. River sand scarcity — driven by environmental bans on uncontrolled river bed mining — forced widespread adoption of manufactured sand. By 2026, M-sand is the primary fine aggregate in most Tier-1 and Tier-2 Indian cities, and IS 383:2016's comprehensive M-sand provisions have become the most-referenced part of the standard. Understanding both river sand and M-sand properties, their differences, and how to account for both in IS 10262:2019 mix design is now an essential skill for every concrete technologist and site engineer in India.
Water Demand: Fine aggregate grading determines 40–60% of the variation in concrete water demand. A shift from Zone II to Zone IV sand can increase water demand by 20–35 kg/m³ — equivalent to raising w/c ratio by 0.06–0.10 at constant cement content, potentially dropping 28-day strength by 8–15 MPa
Workability: Concrete made with angular M-sand is typically 25–40mm stiffer at the same water content as concrete with rounded river sand — requiring SP dosage adjustment to maintain pumpability and placing workability
Durability: High silt content in sand (>3%) is directly correlated with increased chloride permeability and accelerated carbonation — silt particles interfere with cement hydration and weaken the paste-aggregate interface
Surface Finish: Zone IV sand (very fine) produces smoother surfaces but at the cost of significantly higher water demand, shrinkage, and cracking tendency — always use the coarsest sand that gives acceptable finish
IS 383:2016 classifies fine aggregate into four grading zones (I to IV) based on particle size distribution determined by sieve analysis per IS 2386 Part 1:1963. Zone I is coarsest (FM 3.5–4.0) and Zone IV is finest (FM 1.6–2.3). Zone II is the recommended standard for most structural concrete applications.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| IS Sieve | Zone I – Coarse (% Passing) | Zone II – Standard (% Passing) Preferred | Zone III – Medium (% Passing) | Zone IV – Fine (% Passing) | Combined Grading (% Passing) | M-Sand – Zone II (% Passing) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10.00 mm | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 |
| 4.75 mm | 90 – 100 | 90 – 100 | 90 – 100 | 95 – 100 | 95 – 100 | 90 – 100 |
| 2.36 mm | 60 – 95 | 75 – 100 | 85 – 100 | 95 – 100 | 80 – 100 | 75 – 100 |
| 1.18 mm | 30 – 70 | 55 – 90 | 75 – 100 | 90 – 100 | 70 – 100 | 55 – 90 |
| 600 µm | 15 – 34 | 35 – 59 | 60 – 79 | 80 – 100 | 55 – 100 | 35 – 65 |
| 300 µm | 5 – 20 | 8 – 30 | 12 – 40 | 15 – 50 | 10 – 50 | 10 – 35 |
| 150 µm | 0 – 10 | 0 – 10 | 0 – 10 | 0 – 15 | 0 – 15 | 0 – 20* |
| Fineness Modulus | 3.5 – 4.0 | 2.9 – 3.5 | 2.3 – 2.9 | 1.6 – 2.3 | 2.6 – 3.5 | 2.9 – 3.5 |
| Water Demand Effect | Lowest water | Standard (186 kg/m³ IS 10262) | +5–10 kg/m³ | +15–25 kg/m³ | Zone II equivalent | +7 kg/m³ (angular) |
*M-Sand 150µm: IS 383:2016 permits up to 20% fines passing 75µm for M-sand (crusher dust) — higher than natural sand limit of 10%. Methylene Blue Value (MBV) ≤1.0 g/kg must be satisfied. Source: IS 383:2016 Table 2
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Zone | FM Range | Water Demand vs Zone II | IS 10262 FA% Adjustment | Concrete Grade Suitability | Best Applications | Limitations |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone I | 3.5 – 4.0 | −5 to −10 kg/m³ (lower) | Increase FA% to 42–48% | M15 – M45 | Mass concrete; lower cement cost; good for coarse mixes | Harsh mix; poor finish; segregation risk if FA% too low |
| Zone II ★ | 2.9 – 3.5 | Baseline (IS 10262 Table 2) | IS 10262 Annex A defaults | M15 – M70 (all grades) | All structural concrete; optimal balance of workability and water | — |
| Zone III | 2.3 – 2.9 | +5 to +10 kg/m³ | Reduce FA% to 30–35% | M15 – M45 | Pump mixes; better surface finish; plastered structures | Higher water and cement needed; increased shrinkage risk |
| Zone IV | 1.6 – 2.3 | +15 to +25 kg/m³ | Reduce FA% to 28–32% | M15 – M30 only | Smooth finishes; decorative concrete; plasters | NOT recommended M35+ without SP; high shrinkage; strength limited |
Fineness Modulus (FM) is a single number that represents the average particle size of a fine aggregate sample. It is calculated from the sieve analysis results and used to characterise the grading zone and predict water demand. FM ranges from 1.6 (very fine sand, Zone IV) to 4.0 (coarse sand, Zone I). FM is used in IS 10262:2019 Annex A to determine the appropriate FA:CA volume split for mix design.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Sand FM Range | Zone | FA% (Volume) – 20mm CA, w/c 0.35–0.45 | FA% (Volume) – 20mm CA, w/c 0.45–0.55 | FA% (Volume) – 20mm CA, w/c 0.55–0.65 | Adjustment from Zone II Baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.5 – 4.0 | Zone I | 38 – 44% | 40 – 46% | 42 – 48% | +4 to +6% more FA vs Zone II |
| 2.9 – 3.5 | Zone II ★ | 32 – 38% | 34 – 40% | 36 – 42% | Baseline (IS 10262 Annex A Table A-1) |
| 2.3 – 2.9 | Zone III | 28 – 34% | 30 – 36% | 32 – 38% | −4 to −6% less FA vs Zone II |
| 1.6 – 2.3 | Zone IV | 24 – 30% | 26 – 32% | 28 – 34% | −8 to −10% less FA vs Zone II |
| 2.5 – 3.2 (M-Sand) | M-Sand Zone II/III | 30 – 36% | 32 – 38% | 34 – 40% | Similar to Zone II with −2 to −4% for angular particle packing |
Note: Higher w/c mixes have more paste volume available, allowing more FA. Lower w/c (HPC) requires denser CA packing, so less FA. Values based on 20mm crushed CA — adjust for other sizes. Source: IS 10262:2019 Annex A.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Sand Type / Source | SSD SG (Typical Range) | MixDesignCalc Default | Water Absorption (%) | Bulk Density (kg/m³) | FA Mass Change per ±0.05 SG | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| River Sand (Natural, Inland) | 2.60 – 2.67 | 2.65 | 0.5 – 1.5% | 1450 – 1550 | ±14 kg/m³ (at 700 kg/m³ FA) | Most common; test each source; seasonal variation |
| River Sand (Coastal / Estuary) | 2.58 – 2.65 | 2.62 | 0.5 – 2.0% | 1420 – 1520 | ±13 kg/m³ | Test Cl⁻ — coastal river sand may exceed 0.05% limit |
| M-Sand from Granite Most Common 2026 | 2.60 – 2.68 | 2.62 | 1.0 – 2.5% | 1500 – 1620 | ±14 kg/m³ | Angular; +7 kg/m³ water correction vs river sand |
| M-Sand from Basalt | 2.65 – 2.80 | 2.70 | 0.8 – 2.0% | 1550 – 1680 | ±15 kg/m³ | Higher SG — heavier; denser concrete; good for HPC |
| M-Sand from Limestone | 2.55 – 2.65 | 2.60 | 1.5 – 3.5% | 1480 – 1580 | ±14 kg/m³ | Higher absorption; check MBV; soft — not for HPC |
| Quartzite Sand (M-sand) | 2.60 – 2.68 | 2.64 | 0.5 – 1.5% | 1520 – 1620 | ±14 kg/m³ | ASR risk — MBV low but petrographic test required |
| Recycled Fine Aggregate (RFA) | 2.30 – 2.55 | Must test | 3.0 – 8.0% | 1200 – 1450 | ±50+ kg/m³ vs granite default | IS 17452:2022 — NOT permitted in structural concrete; PCC only |
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Moisture State | Description | Surface Water | Pore Water | Batch Water Effect | Site Occurrence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oven Dry (OD) | All moisture removed at 105°C; all pores empty | None | Empty | Absorbs water from mix → ADD water to compensate | Laboratory only; never at site |
| Air Dry (AD) | Surface dry; internal pores partially dry | None | Partially dry | Absorbs some water from mix → ADD water to compensate | Dry weather; covered stockpile |
| Saturated Surface Dry (SSD) | All pores full; surface completely dry — baseline condition | None | Full | No correction needed — design condition | Theoretical reference; test standard |
| Damp / Moist | Pores full + surface moisture present | Present | Full | Adds water to mix → DEDUCT from batch water | Normal site sand (3–6% moisture typical) |
| Saturated (Wet) | Pores full + significant surface water | Significant | Full | Adds large amount → LARGE DEDUCTION from batch water | Monsoon; uncovered stockpile after rain |
Bulking is the increase in volume of moist sand compared to the same sand in a dry or fully saturated state. Surface tension forces between partially wetted sand particles push them apart, increasing the apparent volume without increasing the mass. Bulking is the primary reason why volumetric batching of fine aggregate is unreliable and should be replaced by weight batching in all structural concrete — particularly with M-sand.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Moisture Content (% by mass) | River Sand Bulking (%) | M-Sand Bulking (%) | Volume Increase per m³ Sand | Effect on Nominal Mix (1:1.5:3) | Correction Required |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% (Dry) | 0% | 0% | No increase | None | No correction |
| 0.5% | 5 – 8% | 3 – 5% | ~55 litres per m³ | Sand under-batched by 5–8% | Add 5–8% more sand by volume |
| 2.0% | 15 – 20% | 10 – 14% | ~175 litres per m³ | Sand under-batched by 15–20% | Add 15–20% more sand by volume OR use weight batching |
| 5.0% Typical Site | 25 – 35% | 18 – 25% | ~300 litres per m³ | Sand under-batched by 25–35% if not corrected | Critical correction needed; use weight batching |
| 7.0% | 20 – 30% | 15 – 20% | ~250 litres per m³ | Slightly less than peak — surface water beginning to fill voids | Weight batching essential |
| 10.0% (Saturated) | 0 – 5% | 0 – 3% | Near zero — surface tension eliminated | Near zero — fully saturated sand does not bulk significantly | Deduct surface water from batch water |
The Problem: A site uses nominal mix 1:1.5:3 (C:FA:CA) and batches 1.5 volumes of sand. In the morning, sand moisture is 2% and bulking = 18%. The volume measured looks like 1.5 but actually contains only 1.5/1.18 = 1.27 actual volumes of sand. The mix is deficient in fine aggregate by 15%, making it harsh, prone to bleeding, and weak.
After afternoon rain, sand moisture = 7% and bulking = 28%. The same 1.5 volumes contains only 1.5/1.28 = 1.17 actual volumes of sand. Now the concrete is even coarser, segregation risk increases, and cube strength drops further.
Within a single day, the actual sand content in nominally identical batches can vary by 15–25% — causing compressive strength variation of 5–15 MPa for the same grade — a standard deviation of 5–7 MPa, firmly in the "Poor" control category.
The Solution: Always use weight (mass) batching for fine aggregate. This is why IS 10262:2019 is based on mass per m³, not volumes. CPWD 2024 specifications mandate weight batching for all structural concrete M20 and above.
Deleterious substances — materials other than clean sand particles — reduce concrete strength, increase water demand, and damage long-term durability. IS 383:2016 sets strict limits that must be verified by testing per IS 2386 before use of any new sand source, and periodically thereafter.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Deleterious Substance | Test Method | IS 383 Limit (M10–M35) | IS 383 Limit (M40+) | River Sand (Typical) | M-Sand (Typical) | Effect on Concrete if Exceeded |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay Lumps | IS 2386 Part 2 | ≤ 1.0% | ≤ 0.5% | 0.5 – 1.5% | Nil | Swell on wetting → popouts, surface cracking; weakens ITZ |
| Silt & Fine Dust (Field Test) | IS 2386 Part 2 (sedimentation) | ≤ 3% (by volume) | ≤ 1% (by volume) | 1 – 4% | 0.5 – 3% | Increases water demand; weakens paste-aggregate bond; reduces durability |
| Organic Impurities | IS 2386 Part 2 (colorimetric) | ≤ Light Yellow (colour plate) | ≤ Light Yellow | Nil to Light | Nil (crushed rock) | Retards cement hydration; reduces early strength; causes staining |
| Coal and Lignite | IS 2386 Part 2 | ≤ 1.0% | ≤ 0.5% | Varies by river | Nil | Low-density coal floats, creates voids; lignite expands, causes popouts |
| Light Material (below 2.0 SG) | IS 2386 Part 2 | ≤ 1.0% | ≤ 0.5% | Varies | Low | Creates voids; reduces concrete density; weakens matrix |
| Chloride Content (Cl⁻) | IS 2386 Part 1 | ≤ 0.05% (RCC); ≤ 0.025% (PSC) | ≤ 0.05% (RCC); ≤ 0.025% (PSC) | <0.03% (inland) | <0.01% (crushed rock) | Chloride-induced steel corrosion — most critical durability failure mode |
| Sulphate Content (as SO₃) | IS 2386 Part 1 | ≤ 0.4% in FA; total concrete ≤ 4% | ≤ 0.4% in FA | <0.2% | <0.1% | Sulphate attack on C₃A → ettringite expansion → cracking |
| Mica Content | Petrographic / visual estimate | ≤ 5% (guidance) | ≤ 2% | 0 – 8% (granite-derived) | Variable | Mica is weak and flaky — reduces bond, increases water demand |
| Methylene Blue Value (MBV) | EN 933-9 (for M-sand) | ≤ 1.0 g/kg (M-sand) | ≤ 1.0 g/kg | N/A (river sand) | ≤ 1.0 g/kg (IS 383) | High MBV = clay-active fines → swelling, cracking, water demand increase |
When to Wash: When field silt test shows >3% silt for M20–M35 concrete, or >1% for M40+ concrete. When organic colorimetric test shows "Medium" or "Dark" colour. When sand has visible muddy / clay coating on particles.
How to Wash: Place sand in a large tank with water; agitate thoroughly; allow silt/clay to float off in overflow water; repeat 2–3 times until wash water runs clear. Drain and allow to reach SSD condition before use. Measure FM after washing — washing sometimes removes fine sand particles, shifting grading coarser.
After Washing: Re-test silt content, FM, and organic matter. Recalculate batch water correction for changed moisture state. Re-test SG and absorption — washing does not change SSD SG but confirm.
Rejection Criteria: Sand with organic impurity "Dark" colour (mortar bar strength <95% of control at 28 days) must be rejected — washing alone is insufficient to remove organic compounds that have been adsorbed onto particle surfaces.
Manufactured sand is produced by crushing hard rock (granite, basalt, limestone, or quartzite) to the required particle size distribution in a cone crusher or vertical shaft impactor (VSI). VSI crushers produce more cubical particles with lower mica and flaky particle content — preferred for M-sand production. IS 383:2016 now provides a dedicated M-sand specification that addresses its unique properties compared to natural river sand.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Production Stage | Equipment | Key Quality Control Point | Test at This Stage | Reject Criterion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parent Rock Quarrying | Drill + blast or ripping | Rock quality — no weathered or laminated material | Petrography; LA abrasion of parent | Highly weathered rock; LA >30% |
| Primary Crushing | Jaw crusher | Reduce to 75–100mm for secondary crusher | Visual check for clay seams | Clay bands or soil intrusions in feed |
| Secondary Crushing | Cone crusher | Reduce to 10–20mm for VSI or final crushing | Particle shape check (flakiness) | Flakiness Index >25% before VSI stage |
| Tertiary / Fine Crushing | VSI (Vertical Shaft Impactor) — preferred | Particle shape, gradation control, fines content | Sieve analysis; MBV test | Fines >20% passing 75µm; MBV >1.0 g/kg |
| Screening / Washing | Vibrating screen; water wash optional | Remove excess fines; achieve target grading | Sieve analysis; FM check | FM outside 2.3–3.5; failing Zone II or III limits |
| Stockpiling | Covered storage bins or open stockpile | Prevent contamination; measure moisture | Silt content; moisture content | Silt >3%; signs of clay contamination |
| Delivery & Acceptance at Site | Tipper trucks | Verify grading and silt content on each delivery | Field silt test; visual FM estimate | Visible clay lumps; silt >3% field test |
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| Test Parameter | IS 383:2016 Requirement for M-Sand | Test Standard | Test Frequency | Action if Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Grading / Zone Compliance | Must comply with Zone I, II, III, or IV limits | IS 2386 Part 1 | Weekly (each delivery for govt. projects) | Blend with different-graded sand; adjust FA:CA ratio; reject |
| Fineness Modulus | Report and track; within ±0.2 of design FM | IS 2386 Part 1 | Weekly; each delivery | Adjust FA:CA ratio; inform mix design engineer |
| Specific Gravity (SSD) | Report actual; typically 2.60–2.68 for granite M-sand | IS 2386 Part 3 | Each new source; quarterly | Update MixDesignCalc; redesign if differs by >0.05 |
| Water Absorption | Report actual; use for batch water correction | IS 2386 Part 3 | Each new source; quarterly | Update batch water correction in mix design |
| Fines Passing 75µm (0.075mm) | ≤ 15% by mass (IS 383:2016 for M-sand) | IS 2386 Part 1 (washing sieve) | Weekly; each delivery for M40+ | Wash M-sand to reduce fines; reject if MBV fails |
| Methylene Blue Value (MBV) | ≤ 1.0 g/kg (IS 383:2016 — unique to M-sand) | EN 933-9 (adopted in IS 383:2016) | Each new quarry source; quarterly minimum | Reject if >1.0 g/kg — clay-active fines risk |
| Clay Lumps | ≤ 1.0% (M20–M35); ≤ 0.5% (M40+) | IS 2386 Part 2 | Each new source; monthly | Reject or wash; investigate quarry for clay intrusions |
| Chloride Content (Cl⁻) | ≤ 0.05% by mass (RCC); ≤ 0.025% (PSC) | IS 2386 Part 1 | Each new quarry; annually if consistent source | Reject; this is rare for crushed rock but check coastal quarries |
| Soundness (Na₂SO₄, 5 cycles) | ≤ 10% loss (Na₂SO₄); ≤ 15% (MgSO₄) | IS 2386 Part 5 | Each new quarry source | Reject if exceeds limit — aggregate not sound |
| Parent Rock LA Abrasion | Parent rock ≤ 30% (IS 383:2016) | IS 2386 Part 4 | Each new quarry source | Reject weak parent rock; switch quarry |
| Alkali-Silica Reactivity (ASR) | Test if parent rock is potentially reactive (quartzite, greywacke) | IS 2386 Part 7; ASTM C1260 | Each new quarry source; mandatory for bridges | ASR mitigation (GGBS 40%+) or reject quarry |
| Flakiness of Parent Rock | Flakiness Index ≤ 25% for parent before VSI | IS 2386 Part 1 | Each quarry audit | Switch to VSI crushing; check parent rock lamination |
The FA:CA volume ratio (percentage of total aggregate volume that is fine aggregate) is the key aggregate proportioning decision in IS 10262:2019 Annex A. Getting this ratio wrong shifts the balance between workability, water demand, strength, and shrinkage. The IS 10262 Annex A table provides guidance but the final ratio should always be validated in trial mixes.
← Scroll horizontally to view all columns →
| FA Zone | Max CA Size (mm) | w/c 0.35–0.40 | w/c 0.40–0.45 | w/c 0.45–0.50 | w/c 0.50–0.55 | w/c 0.55–0.65 | Rationale |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zone I | 10 | 44–50% | 46–52% | 48–54% | 50–56% | 52–58% | Coarse sand with small CA → needs high FA% to fill voids |
| Zone I | 20 | 38–44% | 40–46% | 42–48% | 44–50% | 46–52% | Standard Zone I with 20mm CA — common for mass concrete |
| Zone I | 40 | 34–40% | 36–42% | 38–44% | 40–46% | 42–48% | Zone I + large CA — lower FA% needed |
| Zone II ★ | 10 | 40–46% | 42–48% | 44–50% | 46–52% | 48–54% | Zone II + 10mm CA → more FA needed for voids |
| Zone II ★ | 20 Most Common | 32–38% | 34–40% | 36–42% | 38–44% | 40–46% | IS 10262 baseline — most used combination |
| Zone II ★ | 40 | 28–34% | 30–36% | 32–38% | 34–40% | 36–42% | Large CA → lower FA%; less paste needed |
| Zone III | 10 | 36–42% | 38–44% | 40–46% | 42–48% | 44–50% | Fine sand → reduce FA%; more CA for aggregate skeleton |
| Zone III | 20 | 28–34% | 30–36% | 32–38% | 34–40% | 36–42% | Zone III + 20mm — reduce from Zone II baseline by ~4% |
| Zone IV | 10 | 32–38% | 34–40% | 36–42% | 38–44% | 40–46% | Very fine — use sparingly; high water demand risk |
| Zone IV | 20 | 24–30% | 26–32% | 28–34% | 30–36% | 32–38% | Very fine sand — reduce FA% significantly; SP essential for M35+ |
Q: What is the best sand zone for concrete in India?
Zone II (FM 2.9–3.5) is the recommended zone for all structural concrete per IS 10262:2019 Annex A. Zone II sand provides the best balance of water demand, workability, surface finish, and aggregate packing. All base values in IS 10262 Table 2 (free water content) are calibrated for Zone II sand — no adjustment factor is needed.
Q: Can Zone IV sand be used for M30 concrete?
Zone IV sand is technically permitted for M30 but not recommended. It increases water demand by 15–25 kg/m³, requiring additional cement to maintain w/c ratio (20–35 kg/m³ more cement). It also significantly increases drying shrinkage. If Zone IV sand is the only option, use PCE superplasticizer to control water, reduce FA% to 26–32%, and ensure concrete is not used for exposed or crack-sensitive elements.
Q: What is the difference between FM and sieve analysis?
Sieve analysis is the full particle size distribution test (% passing each sieve). FM is a single number derived from the sieve analysis — the sum of cumulative % retained on 6 standard sieves divided by 100. Sieve analysis gives the complete picture; FM summarises it into one number for zone classification and mix design adjustment. Both are required: use sieve analysis to confirm zone compliance, and FM to track production consistency.
Q: How does monsoon affect sand in concrete mix design?
During monsoon, sand moisture can increase from a typical dry-season 2–3% to 6–10%. This has two effects: (1) batch water must be significantly reduced (40+ litres/m³ may need to be deducted), and (2) bulking is reduced (wet sand bulks less, affecting volumetric batching). If batch water correction is not applied in monsoon, the actual w/c ratio can be 0.10–0.15 higher than designed, dropping 28-day strength by 10–20 MPa. Always measure sand moisture daily in monsoon, or use an automated moisture sensor at the batching plant.
Q: What is the Methylene Blue Value test for M-sand?
The Methylene Blue Value (MBV) test measures the presence of clay-active minerals (montmorillonite, smectite) in the fine fraction of M-sand. Unlike silt (which is inert mineral dust), clay minerals absorb water and swell, causing cracking and durability problems. IS 383:2016 requires MBV ≤ 1.0 g/kg for M-sand. If MBV exceeds this, even if silt content appears low, the fines contain expansive clay minerals and the M-sand must be washed or rejected. The test uses methylene blue dye that binds to clay minerals — more dye absorbed means more clay activity.
Q: What is the IS standard for manufactured sand (M-sand)?
IS 383:2016 is the primary standard covering M-sand specifications, grading requirements, MBV limit, fines content limit, and all deleterious substance limits. IS 16723:2018 provides guidelines for M-sand production plants. IS 2386 Parts 1–3 cover the test methods. All are available from BIS India at bis.gov.in.